Opened at 2016-04-07T16:17:07Z
Last modified at 2016-04-08T17:08:58Z
#2772 new defect
Gmail Classifying TWN Emails as Spam
Reported by: | marlowe | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | undecided |
Component: | operational | Version: | 1.11.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Launchpad Bug: |
Description
Multiple users have reported gmail tagging TWN emails as spam. The following was provided by an affected user
"*Authentication & Identification *
To ensure that Gmail can identify you:
- Use a consistent IP address to send bulk mail.
- Keep valid reverse DNS records for the IP address(es) from which you send mail, pointing to your domain.
- Use the same address in the 'From:' header on every bulk mail you send.
We also recommend the following:
- Sign messages with DKIM <http://www.dkim.org/>. We do not authenticate messages signed with keys using fewer than 1024 bits.
- Publish an SPF record <https://support.google.com/a/answer/33786>.
- Publish a DMARC policy <http://www.dmarc.org/>.
Learn more <https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180707> about email authentication."
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed at 2016-04-07T16:26:53Z by marlowe
comment:2 Changed at 2016-04-07T16:39:43Z by marlowe
If we implement option_from_is_list and DKIM signing as recommended here, http://serverfault.com/questions/340584/mailman-from-spoofing, this should resolve all the criteria listed above.
comment:3 Changed at 2016-04-07T18:15:57Z by warner
We should also look at the trac mailing lists: I think the root cause here might be spammy ticket/comments (which were then mailed to subscribers of tahoe-lafs-trac-stream). We seem to have fixed the comment spam problem for now, but our IP probably got a bad reputation while those messages were going out.
Zooko told me he's seeing spam sent to tahoe-dev-owner, which then gets forwarded to him and a few other people who admin/moderate that list.
comment:4 Changed at 2016-04-08T17:08:58Z by marlowe
Brian,
Let's set up a time next week where we can work on this together.
Cheers, Patrick
SPF record appears in order.
"Received-SPF: pass (antagonism.org: SPF record at tahoe-lafs.org designates 74.207.252.227 as permitted sender)" and "SPF_HELO_PASS" from SpamAssassin?
As does reverse DNS,
"nslookup 74.207.252.227 Server: 127.0.1.1 Address: 127.0.1.1#53
Non-authoritative answer: 227.252.207.74.in-addr.arpa name = tahoe-lafs.org."
We do not do DKIM. We should look into this.