Changes between Version 13 and Version 14 of Bibliography

Timestamp:

2008-05-08T18:42:58Z (17 years ago)

Author:

zooko

Comment:

add papers about failures of local filesystems

Bibliography

@@ -24 +24 @@
 == Local Filesystems ==
 
-[https://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf IRON Filesystems] examines how ext3, reiserfs, xfs, and ntfs handle various sorts of errors
+Model-Based Failure Analysis of Journaling File Systems [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.78.8911 citeseer] [http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/sfa-dsn05.pdf PDF] compares ext3, reiserfs, and JFS under conditions of latent sector errors.  (Impatient people: read the Introduction and look at the table on page 9.)
+
+IRON Filesystems [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.66.3785 citeseer] [https://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/iron-sosp05.pdf PDF], a follow-on by the authors of "Model-Based Failure Analysis of Journaling File Systems" examines how ext3, reiserfs, xfs, and ntfs handle various sorts of errors (impatient people, see table on page 8, "File System Summary" on page 9, and table on page 10).
+
+Using Model Checking to Find Serious File System Errors [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.80.8142 citeseer] [https://www.stanford.edu/~engler/osdi04-fisc.pdf PDF] analyzes ext3, JFS, and reiserfs (impatient: page 10).
+
+eXplode: A lightweight, general approach for finding serious errors in storage systems [https://www.stanford.edu/~engler/explode-osdi06.pdf PDF], a follow-on by the authors of "Using Model Checking to Find Serious File System Errors", compares ext2, ext3, reiserfs, reiser4, jfs, xfs, msdos, vfat, hfs, and hfs+ to see if you sync them and then crash them if your allegedly synced data is actually recoverable (impatient: page 11)
 
 == See Also ==