Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #999, comment 19


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-07-27T23:10:14Z (13 years ago)
Author:
Zancas
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #999, comment 19

    initial v1  
    1   My current test suite contains several tests that Zooko calls "transparent box".  I need to decide whether they are appropriate.
     1  My current test suite contains several tests that Zooko calls "transparent box".  I need to decide whether they are appropriate:
    22
    3  Test 1: remote_allocate_buckets populates incoming with shnum(s)
    4  Test 2: an attempt to allocate the same share (same ss) does _not_ create a new bucketwriter
    5  Test 3: test allocated size
    6  Test 4: together remote_write, remote_close, get_shares, and read_share_data behave
     31. remote_allocate_buckets populates incoming with shnum(s)
     42. an attempt to allocate the same share (same ss) does _not_ create a new bucketwriter
     53. test allocated size
     64. together remote_write, remote_close, get_shares, and read_share_data behave
    77
    8   Since I am altering the location (from server to backend/core) of some of this functionality, and since I am altering the mechanism by which the filesystem is manipulated (to FilePath)... I think all of these tests are necessary.
     8  Since I am altering the location (from server to backend/core) of some of this functionality, and since I am altering the mechanism by which the filesystem is manipulated (to !FilePath)... I think all of these tests are necessary.
    99
    1010  It would be nice if the tests were designed to ensure the proper behavior independent of the underlying storage medium...  but I think I need to assume a filesystem-like interface for at least (1,2, and 4), probably (3) as well...