Opened at 2021-08-18T15:13:18Z
Last modified at 2021-09-01T14:44:46Z
#3773 closed task
Merge adding lease with renewing lease (for immutables) — at Version 1
Reported by: | itamarst | Owned by: | itamarst |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | HTTP Storage Protocol |
Component: | unknown | Version: | n/a |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Launchpad Bug: |
Description (last modified by itamarst)
- From a client perspective, the goal is just to have a lease, whether it's a new lease or renewing a lease is irrelevant; renewing is essentially an optimization detail on server side.
- Cancelling leases is not actually supported.
- The way lease renewal secrets are generated is likely to change in the switchover from foolscap to HTTP.
- Internally, the server _already_ treats renewing a lease as potentially adding a new one if renewal fails.
As such, the distinction between adding a lease and renewing a lease is unnecessary (presuming item 4 is actually correct!). We would like to simplify HTTP protocol by removing it, and we need to make sure server can gracefully handle clients switching their renewal secret.
Therefore, we should merge the two into a single operation:
- Validate item 4 above, since it's critical requirement for the rest of this.
- In Foolscap client, switch to only using renewal code path.
- Make sure server creating new lease when renewal fails is well tested, so users don't lose data.
- On server-side, leave new lease Foolscap endpoint in place for backwards compat.
- In new GBS HTTP protocol spec, switch to a single end point for lease creation/renewal, and remove all references to lease cancellation secret.
Change History (1)
comment:1 Changed at 2021-08-18T15:14:15Z by itamarst
- Description modified (diff)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.