Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2035, comment 9


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-07-23T18:26:01Z (11 years ago)
Author:
srl
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #2035, comment 9

    initial v1  
    22> Therefore I propose this is a bug in backupdb caching logic.  If possible it should verify the health of items in the cache.  If this is expensive, maybe it could be an opt-in behavior with a commandline option.
    33
    4 backup-and-verify would be nice. I would think that backup could be efficient here, simply check if the shares are there before re-using its cache.
     4backup-and-verify would be nice. I would think that backup could be efficient here, check if the shares are there before re-using its cache.
    55
    66Also note the trick is to nuke the database AND unlink. So that trick probably can't work with preserving the Archived items.