Opened at 2013-05-30T18:11:42Z
Closed at 2013-07-02T22:31:12Z
#1994 closed defect (somebody else's problem)
S3 Error during initialization of S3 store to use with S3(cloud) backend
Reported by: | Zancas | Owned by: | Zancas |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | undecided |
Component: | code-storage | Version: | 1.10.0 |
Keywords: | cloud S3 | Cc: | |
Launchpad Bug: |
Description
I attempted to create an S3 bucket to use with the S3 backend (by signing up for the LeastAuthority cyphertext storage service). Here's a normal message printed during such a signup:
Creating S3 bucket in 'US East' region...
it was immediately followed by this error:
Failure notification sent for the following error: S3Error: Error Message: A conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against this resource. Please try again. Command failed with exit code 1.
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed at 2013-05-30T19:07:46Z by daira
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed at 2013-05-30T19:13:26Z by daira
I was actually hoping to get the HTTP error code from the log, but txaws exception messages don't include that. (The error handling in Tahoe-LAFS' S3 code does include it.)
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 ; follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed at 2013-06-06T15:58:25Z by Zancas
Replying to daira:
I was actually hoping to get the HTTP error code from the log, but txaws exception messages don't include that. (The error handling in Tahoe-LAFS' S3 code does include it.)
Should we put adding HTTP error codes to txaws exceptions into a scrumdo story?
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed at 2013-06-14T23:36:26Z by daira
[deleted; comment was based on an error]
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed at 2013-06-21T03:14:59Z by Zancas
Should we storify (on ScrumDo) eliminating our dependence on txaws?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed at 2013-06-21T09:26:58Z by daira
Replying to Zancas:
Should we storify (on ScrumDo) eliminating our dependence on txaws?
I only want to do that for Tahoe-LAFS itself (which should be a Tahoe-LAFS ticket), but that isn't relevant to this error from the LeastAuthority automation.
comment:7 Changed at 2013-07-02T22:31:12Z by daira
- Resolution set to somebody else's problem
- Status changed from new to closed
Here's the traceback and the full message from S3 (from signup_logs/2013-05-30T163714Z-bwsr6f7llsqkyj7o2qoade3enfjeh2es on phi):
(That doesn't actually tell us anything new, just added for completeness.)