Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1383, comment 1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-03-30T20:55:19Z (14 years ago)
Author:
davidsarah
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #1383, comment 1

    initial v1  
    1414> 2. We could hack the fork of setuptools which is bundled into the Tahoe-LAFS source tree (sometimes called "zetuptoolz") so that it doesn't treat a missing extra as a fatal error. The theory being that if the package doesn't declare an extra then probably it actually has that extra but didn't declare it.
    1515
    16 Well, if the installed package doesn't satisfy the dependency (for whatever reason), then setuptools should try to download a version that does. Even if the latter has the same version, it might not have the same packaging error.
     16Well, if the installed package doesn't satisfy the dependency (for whatever reason), then setuptools should try to download a version that does. Even if the latter has the same version ''number'', it might not have the same packaging error.
    1717
    1818OTOH I'm pretty hacked off with the quantity and subtlety of setuptools bugs and misdesign; we've reached a point of diminishing returns in attempting to fix it.