does Tahoe play well with ceph?

[Oleksandr Drach]

Hello Eugen,


2014-03-24 14:53 GMT+02:00 Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org>:

> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Oleksandr Drach wrote:
> > Hello Eugen!
> >
> > Really strange question.
> > Why do you need to put Tahoe on top of Ceph? Are such overheads
> acceptable
> > at all?
>
> I think about ceph as building high-performance high-availability
> expandable storage from unreliable components on a (ultra)local, fast,
> reliable network.
>

What are the advantages of using Ceph vs Tahoe?
Tahoe itself also can be used for building the describes storage without
below Ceph layer.


> Tahoe would be a higher level service which can use above storage backend
> over a number of WAN links.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20140325/62f02891/attachment.html>