[tahoe-dev] Tahoe on NAS drives
Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga
humberto at hpcf.upr.edu
Sun Aug 2 03:46:55 PDT 2009
I have a Linksys NSLU2, here's the memory:
-bash-3.2$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 30520 29828 692 0 8616 7288
-/+ buffers/cache: 13924 16596
Swap: 112440 13844 98596
32MB RAM in the device. It has a hard time compiling the prerequisites
for tahoe. Plus it's an ARM processor, so it didn't work right.
Shawn Willden wrote:
> On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:46:26 am Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> Sure--that's another possibility. Examples in this group are the
>> Buffalo NAS products, NSLU2, ...
>>
>> However, keep in mind that they typically have quite limitd RAM, so
>> letting them do erasure-encoding on large files will be a pain at
>> least. Maybe a helper node might be of use here...
>
> What does "limited" mean? Tahoe doesn't actually require all that much, by
> modern standards. Large files are processed in segments. I have a Linux
> Virtual Server which I'm using as a helper node, and it only has 512 MiB
> total (hard limit, no swap), over half of which is being used by other stuff.
> Hasn't been an issue. When I asked if it would be, Brian (IIRC) said that
> Tahoe's working set size is around 40 MiB.
>
> Shawn.
> _______________________________________________
> tahoe-dev mailing list
> tahoe-dev at allmydata.org
> http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
--
Humberto Ortiz Zuazaga
Programmer-Archaeologist
High Performance Computing facility
University of Puerto Rico
http://www.hpcf.upr.edu/~humberto/
More information about the tahoe-dev
mailing list